From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Rui <wirelesser@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi bpf filter will impact performance?
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:09:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291190956.2856.485.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQ9c_C6LzNf5c3BbJXQTVKmbqf6KR9K23tGETw@mail.gmail.com>
Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 15:59 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 15:36 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> >
> > Oh well, it seems you read over my neck, I was preparing a patch with
> > SKF_AD_RXHASH and SKF_AD_CPU
> >
> >
>
> Nice to hear it. :)
>
> There are too many filters: bpf, iptables and tc. Maybe an unified one
> such as nft is needed. Then the duplicate code would be reduced. Maybe
> it is just a good dream.
>
You forgot the rxhash function as well, it would be nice to augment it
with custom code if necessary.
A dream would be to have a native compiler, and not interpret pseudo
code...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-30 9:22 multi bpf filter will impact performance? Rui
2010-11-30 9:34 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=VpmnrXTBNV7McQm6mq9ULT7KTKbM8_hLPoL=2@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1291127670.2904.96.camel@edumazet-laptop>
2010-12-01 3:48 ` Rui
2010-12-01 4:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 7:45 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] filter: add SKF_AD_RXHASH and SKF_AD_CPU Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 8:03 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-06 21:02 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 9:40 ` multi bpf filter will impact performance? Junchang Wang
2010-12-01 7:36 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-01 7:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 7:59 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-01 8:09 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-01 8:15 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-01 8:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 17:22 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-12-01 18:18 ` David Miller
2010-12-01 18:24 ` David Miller
2010-12-01 18:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 18:44 ` David Miller
2010-12-01 19:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-01 20:23 ` David Miller
2010-12-01 20:45 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] filter: add a security check at install time Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 2:30 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-02 6:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 8:11 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-02 8:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 9:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 9:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-02 9:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 10:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-02 11:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 11:29 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-02 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-02 10:59 ` Changli Gao
2010-12-06 21:07 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 6:32 ` multi bpf filter will impact performance? Eric Dumazet
2010-12-05 20:53 ` PATCH] filter: fix sk_filter rcu handling Eric Dumazet
2010-12-05 21:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-05 21:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-06 17:29 ` David Miller
2010-11-30 10:01 ` multi bpf filter will impact performance? Eric Dumazet
2010-11-30 11:17 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291190956.2856.485.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wirelesser@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox