From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: init ingress queue
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 09:47:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291452427.2806.90.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291441558-3196-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Le samedi 04 décembre 2010 à 13:45 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> The dev field of ingress queue is forgot to initialized, then NULL
> pointer dereference happens in qdisc_alloc().
< deleted oops >
> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index cd24374..8083c68 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5577,6 +5577,8 @@ struct netdev_queue *dev_ingress_queue_create(struct net_device *dev)
> queue = kzalloc(sizeof(*queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!queue)
> return NULL;
> + netdev_queue_numa_node_write(queue, -1);
> + queue->dev = dev;
> netdev_init_one_queue(dev, queue, NULL);
> queue->qdisc = &noop_qdisc;
> queue->qdisc_sleeping = &noop_qdisc;
Hi Changli, thanks for bug report and patch.
IMHO there is no point to include this long Oops report in Changelog for
a net-next-2.6 temporary problem, there wont be any bugzilla report.
Instead, you could say it is a followup patch for commits 1d24eb4815d1e0
and f2cd2d3e9b3ef960. Two or three lines with relevant information.
I suggest you submit following patch instead, as this seems cleaner to
me ?
(factorize the two inits in netdev_init_one_queue())
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index cd24374..36e10b4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5113,7 +5113,6 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
{
unsigned int count = dev->num_tx_queues;
struct netdev_queue *tx;
- int i;
BUG_ON(count < 1);
@@ -5125,10 +5124,6 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
}
dev->_tx = tx;
- for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- netdev_queue_numa_node_write(&tx[i], -1);
- tx[i].dev = dev;
- }
return 0;
}
@@ -5140,6 +5135,8 @@ static void netdev_init_one_queue(struct net_device *dev,
spin_lock_init(&queue->_xmit_lock);
netdev_set_xmit_lockdep_class(&queue->_xmit_lock, dev->type);
queue->xmit_lock_owner = -1;
+ netdev_queue_numa_node_write(queue, -1);
+ queue->dev = dev;
}
static void netdev_init_queues(struct net_device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-04 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-04 5:45 [PATCH] net: init ingress queue Changli Gao
2010-12-04 8:47 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-04 8:55 ` Changli Gao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-04 12:31 Changli Gao
2010-12-04 13:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-05 21:05 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291452427.2806.90.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox