public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: linux1394-devel <linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] NET: IPV4: ARP: allow to invalidate specific ARP entries
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 09:19:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291537161.2806.109.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291504514.1874.92.camel@maxim-laptop>

Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 01:15 +0200, Maxim Levitsky a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 04:09 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > IPv4 over firewire needs to be able to remove ARP entries
> > from the ARP cache that belong to nodes that are removed, because
> > IPv4 over firewire uses ARP packets for private information
> > about nodes.
> > 
> > This information becomes invalid as soon as node drops
> > off the bus and when it reconnects, its only possible
> > to start takling to is after it responded to an ARP packet.
> > But ARP cache prevents such packets from being sent.
> > 
> > CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > CC: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> > CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> 
> Anybody?
> 
> Best regards,
> 	Maxim Levitsky
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  include/net/arp.h |    1 +
> >  net/ipv4/arp.c    |   29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/net/arp.h b/include/net/arp.h
> > index f4cf6ce..91f0568 100644
> > --- a/include/net/arp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/arp.h
> > @@ -25,5 +25,6 @@ extern struct sk_buff *arp_create(int type, int ptype, __be32 dest_ip,
> >  				  const unsigned char *src_hw,
> >  				  const unsigned char *target_hw);
> >  extern void arp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb);
> > +int arp_invalidate(struct net_device *dev, __be32 ip);
> >  
> >  #endif	/* _ARP_H */
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> > index d8e540c..35b1272 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> > @@ -1142,6 +1142,23 @@ static int arp_req_get(struct arpreq *r, struct net_device *dev)
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> > +int arp_invalidate(struct net_device *dev, __be32 ip)
> > +{
> > +	int err = -ENXIO;
> > +	struct neighbour *neigh = neigh_lookup(&arp_tbl, &ip, dev);
> > +
> > +	if (neigh) {
> > +		if (neigh->nud_state & ~NUD_NOARP)
> > +			err = neigh_update(neigh, NULL, NUD_FAILED,
> > +					   NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE|
> > +					   NEIGH_UPDATE_F_ADMIN);
> > +		neigh_release(neigh);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arp_invalidate);
> > +
> >  static int arp_req_delete_public(struct net *net, struct arpreq *r,
> >  		struct net_device *dev)
> >  {
> > @@ -1162,7 +1179,6 @@ static int arp_req_delete(struct net *net, struct arpreq *r,
> >  {
> >  	int err;
> >  	__be32 ip;
> > -	struct neighbour *neigh;
> >  
> >  	if (r->arp_flags & ATF_PUBL)
> >  		return arp_req_delete_public(net, r, dev);
> > @@ -1180,16 +1196,7 @@ static int arp_req_delete(struct net *net, struct arpreq *r,
> >  		if (!dev)
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > -	err = -ENXIO;
> > -	neigh = neigh_lookup(&arp_tbl, &ip, dev);
> > -	if (neigh) {
> > -		if (neigh->nud_state & ~NUD_NOARP)
> > -			err = neigh_update(neigh, NULL, NUD_FAILED,
> > -					   NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE|
> > -					   NEIGH_UPDATE_F_ADMIN);
> > -		neigh_release(neigh);
> > -	}
> > -	return err;
> > +	return arp_invalidate(dev, ip);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 

Hmm..

If somebody can explain why RTNL is held in arp_ioctl() (and therefore
in arp_req_delete()), we might first remove RTNL use in arp_ioctl() so
that your patch can be applied.

Right now it is not good, because RTNL wont be necessarly held when you
are going to call arp_invalidate() ?






  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-05  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-29  2:09 [PATCH 0/5 V2] Firewire networking assorted fixes Maxim Levitsky
2010-11-29  2:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] firewire: ohci: restore GUID on resume Maxim Levitsky
2010-11-29  2:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] firewire: ohci: restart ISO DMA contexts on resume from low power mode Maxim Levitsky
2010-11-29  2:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] NET: IPV4: ARP: allow to invalidate specific ARP entries Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-04 23:15   ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-05  8:19     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-05 11:23       ` [PATCH] net: RCU conversion of dev_getbyhwaddr() and arp_ioctl() Eric Dumazet
2010-12-05 12:03         ` [PATCH net-2.6] llc: fix a device refcount imbalance Eric Dumazet
2010-12-08 17:59           ` David Miller
2010-12-09  3:46             ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-16 21:49               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-08 18:05         ` [PATCH] net: RCU conversion of dev_getbyhwaddr() and arp_ioctl() David Miller
2010-12-08 18:07           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-08 18:10             ` David Miller
2010-12-08 18:11               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-07 12:47   ` [PATCH 3/5] NET: IPV4: ARP: allow to invalidate specific ARP entries Maxim Levitsky
2011-01-07 12:57     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-07 13:15       ` Maxim Levitsky
2011-01-08 23:57       ` Maxim Levitsky
2011-01-11  0:11         ` David Miller
2010-11-29  2:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] firewire: net: invalidate ARP entries of removed nodes Maxim Levitsky
2010-11-29  2:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] firewire: net: ratelimit error messages Maxim Levitsky
2010-11-29 15:02 ` [PATCH 0/5 V2] Firewire networking assorted fixes Stefan Richter
2010-12-04 23:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-08  3:32 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-09  1:42   ` Maxim Levitsky
     [not found]   ` <20101208040559.20639.qmail@stuge.se>
     [not found]     ` <1291809485.5421.0.camel@maxim-laptop>
2010-12-12 17:09       ` [PATCH update] firewire: net: add carrier detection Stefan Richter
2010-12-12 23:05         ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-13  0:46           ` [PATCH update 2] " Stefan Richter
2010-12-13 23:01             ` [PATCH update 3] " Stefan Richter
2010-12-14 23:46               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-16  1:17               ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291537161.2806.109.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox