From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: sf-linux-drivers <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: Behaviour of ETHTOOL_GLINK for an interface that's down
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:59:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291672786.5405.23.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
ETHTOOL_GLINK is yet another ethtool operation that has unclear
semantics that results in differing behaviour when the interface is
down.
The two reasonable semantics I can see are:
1. Report whether the host has a working link, i.e. netif_running() &&
netif_carrier_on().
2. Report whether the port has a working link. For hardware interfaces,
poll the PHY or firmware unless the port is powered-off. For software
interfaces, report whether the interface could plausibly pass traffic.
The default implementation (ethtool_op_get_link) uses
netif_carrier_ok(), implementing the rather unreasonable semantics:
3. Report whether the port had a working link when the interface was
last up.
At least one driver works around this by setting carrier off in its
ndo_stop() operation.
Here's a small sample of driver behaviours:
bnx2: (1)
bnx2x: (1) (I think)
cxgb3: (1) (but also (2) because PHY is powered off)
e1000e: (2)
gianfar: (3)
igb: (2)
ixgbe: (1)
niu: (3)
sfc: (3) (approximately)
sky2: (3)
tg3: (3) (but also (1) due to setting carrier off in tg3_close())
DaveM said that Network Manager may require (2), although I don't think
this is correct. At least the current version brings all managed
interfaces up whether or not they have link-up already.
My personal preference is for (1).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-06 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-06 21:59 Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-12-09 5:47 ` Behaviour of ETHTOOL_GLINK for an interface that's down Dan Williams
2010-12-09 6:02 ` Dan Williams
2010-12-09 18:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-09 18:29 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291672786.5405.23.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).