netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292194983.3136.294.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D04E38A.1040605@trego.co.il>

On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:00 +0200, Shmulik Hen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> My system is Ubuntu 10.04, running kernel 2.6.32-26-generic.
> 
> Whenever I try to bring up a specific ethernet interface for the second 
> time, my
> system becomes unresponsive for 60 seconds - i.e. no mouse, no keyboard, no
> screen refresh. etc.
> 
> Looking at the driver's code, I could see that it's dev->open() method calls
> wait_event_interruptible_timeout() with a timeout of 60 seconds - exactly
> the delay I'm seeing.

That seems like a stupid thing for it to do.

> I have narrowed the code to a bare minimum (see below - loosely based on
> dummy.c), which only calls mdelay(10000) in it's dev->open() method, and
> still, my system blocks for exactly 10 seconds when I run the following
> sequence:
> 
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 down
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
> 
> At this point - the system is stuck for 10 seconds.

Bringing an interface up or down is a synchronous operation and is
serialised with most other network configuration operations.  So this is
the expected behaviour.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-12 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-12 15:00 System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:03 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-12-13  9:14   ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-13 12:37     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-13 13:11       ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-12 15:08 Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 20:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-12 20:53   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292194983.3136.294.camel@localhost \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.hen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).