From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Hen <shmulik@trego.co.il>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@gmail.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:37:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292243832.2759.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D05E400.7080409@trego.co.il>
Le lundi 13 décembre 2010 à 11:14 +0200, Shmulik Hen a écrit :
> On 12/13/2010 01:03 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:00 +0200, Shmulik Hen wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> My system is Ubuntu 10.04, running kernel 2.6.32-26-generic.
> >>
> >> Whenever I try to bring up a specific ethernet interface for the second
> >> time, my
> >> system becomes unresponsive for 60 seconds - i.e. no mouse, no keyboard, no
> >> screen refresh. etc.
> >>
> >> Looking at the driver's code, I could see that it's dev->open() method calls
> >> wait_event_interruptible_timeout() with a timeout of 60 seconds - exactly
> >> the delay I'm seeing.
> > That seems like a stupid thing for it to do.
> I agree...
> >> I have narrowed the code to a bare minimum (see below - loosely based on
> >> dummy.c), which only calls mdelay(10000) in it's dev->open() method, and
> >> still, my system blocks for exactly 10 seconds when I run the following
> >> sequence:
> >>
> >> > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
> >> > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 down
> >> > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
> >>
> >> At this point - the system is stuck for 10 seconds.
> > Bringing an interface up or down is a synchronous operation and is
> > serialised with most other network configuration operations. So this is
> > the expected behaviour.
> >
> > Ben.
> But why does this happen only the second time I run ifconfig up?
> How come the entire system is totally frozen?
> I can't even switch to other applications running. If I run 'top' in another
> console, it stops refreshing for the entire period.
>
> I'll try to explain better;
> The driver I'm referring to is part of an embedded system development kit.
> It runs on the controlling side, which may be a PC or some Linux embedded
> system. It exposes a virtual interface that allows to communicate via
> ethernet connection to a remote board, and performs the firmware download
> to that board.
> Unfortunately, the firmware download stage is done during dev->open() of
> this virtual interface. The call to wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
> is there to make sure the boot process of the remote board is complete via a
> message. If all goes well the first time, there is no delay, but if the
> operation
> fails for any reason the first time, and a second attempt is made (another
> ifconfig up), we see the freezing.
>
> Since this driver is (mostly) closed source, I had to try and reproduce
> the situation
> in an all open-source driver - this is the sample code I attached to my
> original
> message. The call to mdelay() there is meant to simulate the delay of
> the original
> driver - it schedules.
>
mdelay() does a busy wait. If you are not SMP, this means a 'freeze'
If you want to schedule, you should use msleep()
> Obviously, the correct way to fix this is to separate the firmware
> download part
> from the dev->open() method, but this is not as simple as it may sound - I'm
> currently working on this. In the mean time I'm looking for a simpler
> solution
> (or answer) to our problem.
>
> I'll appreciate any insight on this matter.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Shmulik Hen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 15:00 System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:03 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-12-13 9:14 ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-13 12:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-13 13:11 ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-12 15:08 Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 20:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-12 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292243832.2759.1.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=shmulik.hen@gmail.com \
--cc=shmulik@trego.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox