public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>,
	Vlad Dogaru <ddvlad@rosedu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: add dev_close_many
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:52:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292259145.2759.55.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292249903-3865-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com>

Le lundi 13 décembre 2010 à 16:18 +0200, Octavian Purdila a écrit :
> Add dev_close_many and dev_deactivate_many to factorize another
> expensive sync-rcu operation in the netdevice unregister path.
> 
> $ modprobe dummy numdummies=10000
> $ ip link set dev dummy* up
> $ time rmmod dummy
> 
> Without the patch           With the patch
> 
> real    0m 24.63s           real    0m 5.15s
> user    0m 0.00s            user    0m 0.00s
> sys     0m 6.05s            sys     0m 5.14s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
> ---

Hmm, I think this solves the "rmmod dummy" case, but not the "dismantle
devices one by one", which is the general one (on heavy duty tunnels/ppp
servers)

I think we could use a kernel thread (a workqueue presumably), handling
3 lists of devices to be dismantled, respecting one rcu grace period (or
rcu_barrier()) before transfert of one item from one list to following
one.

This way, each device removal could post a device to this kernel thread
and return to user immediately. Time of RTNL hold would be reduced
(calls to synchronize_rcu() would be done with RTNL not held)




  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-13 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-13 14:18 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: add dev_close_many Octavian Purdila
2010-12-13 16:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-13 17:23   ` Octavian Purdila
2010-12-13 17:32     ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-13 17:52       ` Octavian Purdila
2010-12-13 18:04         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-13 20:54           ` Octavian Purdila
2010-12-13 23:34             ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-13 17:54 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292259145.2759.55.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ddvlad@rosedu.org \
    --cc=lucian.grijincu@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox