From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/3] bonding fixes
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:18:03 +0000
Message-ID: <1292264283.9860.12.camel@bwh-desktop>
References: <1292264216.9860.11.camel@bwh-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:35074 "EHLO
	exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753894Ab0LMSSG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:18:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1292264216.9860.11.camel@bwh-desktop>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

These should of course go to net-2.6, not net-next-2.6.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.