From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: |PATCH net-next-2.6] ifb: use netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx() Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:55:37 -0500 Message-ID: <1292590537.2668.7.camel@mojatatu> References: <1292390636-3156-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> <1292397202.2377.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1292402398.3427.6.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1292417363.2067.17.camel@mojatatu> <1292422896.3427.251.camel@edumazet-laptop> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Changli Gao , "David S. Miller" , Stephen Hemminger , Tom Herbert , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netem@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:61900 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753220Ab0LQMzi (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:55:38 -0500 Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3so290522yxt.19 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:55:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1292422896.3427.251.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mercredi 15 d=C3=A9cembre 2010 =C3=A0 07:49 -0500, jamal a =C3=A9c= rit : > > Eric, did you do at least a simple test on this one?=20 > > It used to be problematic (I cant remember why or > > what use case was problematic). >=20 > Yes, I run SFQ / IFB right now on my dev machine, and found SFQ bugs = by > the way ;) Ok, thanks;-> cheers, jamal