From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ifb: fix a lockdep splat Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:09:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1292591398.2668.20.camel@mojatatu> References: <1292493175.2883.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , changli Gao , netdev To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.161.180]:65097 "EHLO mail-gx0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754120Ab0LQNJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:09:56 -0500 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so365334gxk.11 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:09:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1292493175.2883.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:52 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > After recent ifb changes, we must use lockless __skb_dequeue() since > lock is not anymore initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim > Cc: Changli Gao Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim cheers, jamal