From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ifb: fix a lockdep splat Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:15:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1292591750.2906.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1292493175.2883.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1292591398.2668.20.camel@mojatatu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , changli Gao , netdev To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:56485 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753220Ab0LQNPz (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:15:55 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so599438wyb.19 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:15:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1292591398.2668.20.camel@mojatatu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le vendredi 17 d=C3=A9cembre 2010 =C3=A0 08:09 -0500, jamal a =C3=A9cri= t : > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:52 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > After recent ifb changes, we must use lockless __skb_dequeue() sinc= e > > lock is not anymore initialized. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim > > Cc: Changli Gao >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim Thanks for reviewing Jamal !