From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@google.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window.
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:00:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292907606.2627.151.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292890556-29904-1-git-send-email-nanditad@google.com>
Le lundi 20 décembre 2010 à 16:15 -0800, Nandita Dukkipati a écrit :
> This patch changes the default initial receive window to 10 mss
> (defined constant). The default window is limited to the maximum
> of 10*1460 and 2*mss (when mss > 1460).
>
> draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-00 is a proposal to the IETF that recommends
> increasing TCP's initial congestion window to 10 mss or about 15KB.
> Leading up to this proposal were several large-scale live Internet
> experiments with an initial congestion window of 10 mss (IW10), where
> we showed that the average latency of HTTP responses improved by
> approximately 10%. This was accompanied by a slight increase in
> retransmission rate (0.5%), most of which is coming from applications
> opening multiple simultaneous connections. To understand the extreme
> worst case scenarios, and fairness issues (IW10 versus IW3), we further
> conducted controlled testbed experiments. We came away finding minimal
> negative impact even under low link bandwidths (dial-ups) and small
> buffers. These results are extremely encouraging to adopting IW10.
>
> However, an initial congestion window of 10 mss is useless unless a TCP
> receiver advertises an initial receive window of at least 10 mss.
> Fortunately, in the large-scale Internet experiments we found that most
> widely used operating systems advertised large initial receive windows
> of 64KB, allowing us to experiment with a wide range of initial
> congestion windows. Linux systems were among the few exceptions that
> advertised a small receive window of 6KB. The purpose of this patch is
> to fix this shortcoming.
>
> References:
> 1. A comprehensive list of all IW10 references to date.
> http://code.google.com/speed/protocols/tcpm-IW10.html
>
> 2. Paper describing results from large-scale Internet experiments with IW10.
> http://ccr.sigcomm.org/drupal/?q=node/621
>
> 3. Controlled testbed experiments under worst case scenarios and a
> fairness study.
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/tcpm-0.pdf
>
> 4. Raw test data from testbed experiments (Linux senders/receivers)
> with initial congestion and receive windows of both 10 mss.
> http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/netsrv/?q=content/iw10
>
> 5. Internet-Draft. Increasing TCP's Initial Window.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd/
>
> Signed-off-by: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-21 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 3:20 [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-18 3:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-18 5:14 ` David Miller
2010-12-18 5:13 ` David Miller
2010-12-18 9:08 ` Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-20 17:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-20 18:26 ` Rick Jones
2010-12-20 18:48 ` David Miller
2010-12-21 0:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-21 0:23 ` Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-21 5:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-21 5:33 ` David Miller
2010-12-21 18:27 ` [PATCH " John Heffner
2010-12-21 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292907606.2627.151.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=chavey@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=nanditad@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox