From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CAN: Use inode instead of kernel address for /proc file
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:38:43 -0500
Message-ID: <1293381523.9764.52.camel@Dan>
References: <1293315371.9764.44.camel@Dan> <4D166E9D.5080200@hartkopp.net>
	 <4D1670CC.1000709@hartkopp.net> <1293316904.9764.48.camel@Dan>
	 <4D17270B.5000204@hartkopp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.vsecurity.com ([209.67.252.12]:63580 "EHLO
	mx1.vsecurity.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752262Ab0LZQjK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:39:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4D17270B.5000204@hartkopp.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:29 +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

> Convinced? 8-)
> 

Absolutely.  I didn't mean to come across as argumentative, I was just
trying to anticipate potential objections.  I'll resend shortly.

Thanks,
Dan