Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

[Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>]

Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 16:31 +0100, stefani@seibold.net a écrit :
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> 
> Changelog:
> 31.12.2010 first proposal
> 01.01.2011 code cleanup and fixes suggest by Eric Dumazet
> 02.01.2011 kick away UDP-Lite support
>            change spin_lock_irq into spin_lock_bh
> 	   faster udpcp_release_sock
> 	   base is now linux-next
...

> +/*
> + * Create a new destination descriptor for the given IPV4 address and port
> + */
> +static struct udpcp_dest *new_dest(struct sock *sk, __be32 addr, __be16 port)
> +{
> +	struct udpcp_dest *dest;
> +	struct udpcp_sock *usk = udpcp_sk(sk);
> +
> +	dest = kzalloc(sizeof(*dest), sk->sk_allocation);
> +
> +	if (dest) {
> +		skb_queue_head_init(&dest->xmit);
> +		dest->addr = addr;
> +		dest->port = port;
> +		dest->ackmode = UDPCP_ACK;
> +		list_add_tail(&dest->list, &usk->destlist);
> +	}
> +
> +	return dest;
> +}
> +

I have not found what prevents a malicious user to make destlist grow
and consume all memory ?