From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefani Seibold Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:16:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1294006616.5675.13.camel@wall-e> References: <1293982286-15389-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <1294005329.2535.258.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1294005329.2535.258.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Am Sonntag, den 02.01.2011, 22:55 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet: > Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 =E0 16:31 +0100, stefani@seibold.net a =E9= crit : > > From: Stefani Seibold > >=20 > > Changelog: > > 31.12.2010 first proposal > > 01.01.2011 code cleanup and fixes suggest by Eric Dumazet > > 02.01.2011 kick away UDP-Lite support > > change spin_lock_irq into spin_lock_bh > > faster udpcp_release_sock > > base is now linux-next >=20 > Since you depend on zlib_adler32(), you should add a dependence in > Kconfig so that its available >=20 > select ZLIB_INFLATE >=20 No this is not necessary, since zlib_adler32() is defined as a static inline function in include/linux/zutil.h