From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: IP defragmentation must be ECN aware
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:52:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294249975.10633.74.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105094830.63a68230@nehalam>
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2011 à 09:48 -0800, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> At least make it unsigned int?
>
Let's keep it simple and use u8 as you suggested ;)
[PATCH v2] ipv4: IP defragmentation must be ECN aware
RFC3168 (The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification to IP)
states :
5.3. Fragmentation
ECN-capable packets MAY have the DF (Don't Fragment) bit set.
Reassembly of a fragmented packet MUST NOT lose indications of
congestion. In other words, if any fragment of an IP packet to be
reassembled has the CE codepoint set, then one of two actions MUST be
taken:
* Set the CE codepoint on the reassembled packet. However, this
MUST NOT occur if any of the other fragments contributing to
this reassembly carries the Not-ECT codepoint.
* The packet is dropped, instead of being reassembled, for any
other reason.
This patch implements this requirement for IPv4, choosing the first
action :
If one fragment had NO-ECT codepoint
reassembled frame has NO-ECT
ElIf one fragment had CE codepoint
reassembled frame has CE
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
Use u8 instead of int in ip4_frag_ecn()
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index e6215bd..e6b53a7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/udp.h>
#include <linux/inet.h>
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
+#include <net/inet_ecn.h>
/* NOTE. Logic of IP defragmentation is parallel to corresponding IPv6
* code now. If you change something here, _PLEASE_ update ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -70,11 +71,28 @@ struct ipq {
__be32 daddr;
__be16 id;
u8 protocol;
+ u8 ecn; /* RFC3168 support */
int iif;
unsigned int rid;
struct inet_peer *peer;
};
+#define IPFRAG_ECN_CLEAR 0x01 /* one frag had INET_ECN_NOT_ECT */
+#define IPFRAG_ECN_SET_CE 0x04 /* one frag had INET_ECN_CE */
+
+static inline u8 ip4_frag_ecn(u8 tos)
+{
+ tos = (tos & INET_ECN_MASK) + 1;
+ /*
+ * After the last operation we have (in binary):
+ * INET_ECN_NOT_ECT => 001
+ * INET_ECN_ECT_1 => 010
+ * INET_ECN_ECT_0 => 011
+ * INET_ECN_CE => 100
+ */
+ return (tos & 2) ? 0 : tos;
+}
+
static struct inet_frags ip4_frags;
int ip_frag_nqueues(struct net *net)
@@ -137,6 +155,7 @@ static void ip4_frag_init(struct inet_frag_queue *q, void *a)
qp->protocol = arg->iph->protocol;
qp->id = arg->iph->id;
+ qp->ecn = ip4_frag_ecn(arg->iph->tos);
qp->saddr = arg->iph->saddr;
qp->daddr = arg->iph->daddr;
qp->user = arg->user;
@@ -316,6 +335,7 @@ static int ip_frag_reinit(struct ipq *qp)
qp->q.fragments = NULL;
qp->q.fragments_tail = NULL;
qp->iif = 0;
+ qp->ecn = 0;
return 0;
}
@@ -328,6 +348,7 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
int flags, offset;
int ihl, end;
int err = -ENOENT;
+ u8 ecn;
if (qp->q.last_in & INET_FRAG_COMPLETE)
goto err;
@@ -339,6 +360,7 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
goto err;
}
+ ecn = ip4_frag_ecn(ip_hdr(skb)->tos);
offset = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->frag_off);
flags = offset & ~IP_OFFSET;
offset &= IP_OFFSET;
@@ -472,6 +494,7 @@ found:
}
qp->q.stamp = skb->tstamp;
qp->q.meat += skb->len;
+ qp->ecn |= ecn;
atomic_add(skb->truesize, &qp->q.net->mem);
if (offset == 0)
qp->q.last_in |= INET_FRAG_FIRST_IN;
@@ -583,6 +606,17 @@ static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *prev,
iph = ip_hdr(head);
iph->frag_off = 0;
iph->tot_len = htons(len);
+ /* RFC3168 5.3 Fragmentation support
+ * If one fragment had INET_ECN_NOT_ECT,
+ * reassembled frame also has INET_ECN_NOT_ECT
+ * Elif one fragment had INET_ECN_CE
+ * reassembled frame also has INET_ECN_CE
+ */
+ if (qp->ecn & IPFRAG_ECN_CLEAR)
+ iph->tos &= ~INET_ECN_MASK;
+ else if (qp->ecn & IPFRAG_ECN_SET_CE)
+ iph->tos |= INET_ECN_CE;
+
IP_INC_STATS_BH(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMOKS);
qp->q.fragments = NULL;
qp->q.fragments_tail = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 0:13 [RFC] ECN and IP defragmentation Eric Dumazet
2011-01-05 2:53 ` David Miller
2011-01-05 13:59 ` [PATCH] ipv4: IP defragmentation must be ECN aware Eric Dumazet
2011-01-05 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-01-05 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-05 17:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-01-05 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-01-06 19:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294249975.10633.74.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox