From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100
Message-ID: <1294779020.16410.2.camel@wall-e>
References: <1294764515-15356-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net>
	 <1294765273.2927.65.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
	jj@chaosbits.net, daniel.baluta@gmail.com, jochen@jochen.org,
	hagen@jauu.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, pavel@ucw.cz
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1294765273.2927.65.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 =E0 17:48 +0100, stefani@seibold.net a =E9cr=
it :
> > From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> >=20
> ...
> > The implementation is clean and has absolut no side effects to the =
network
> > subsystems so i ask for merge it into linux, mm-tree or linux-next.
> >=20
> > The patch is against the current linux git tree
> >=20
> > - Stefani
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> > ---
> > =20
>=20
> Reading again UDPCP specs, I find it is IPv4/IPv6 agnostic
>=20
> You copied IPv4 UDP code, so this only handles IPv4...
>=20

Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non o=
f
our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use
it.

If it will be required in the future it will be implemented.