From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
shemminger@vyatta.com, jj@chaosbits.net, daniel.baluta@gmail.com,
jochen@jochen.org, hagen@jauu.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:14:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294780480.17388.2.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110111.125254.133402589.davem@davemloft.net>
Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 12:52 -0800 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100
>
> > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of
> > our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use
> > it.
> >
> > If it will be required in the future it will be implemented.
>
> We require that you implement the ipv6 side for the submission right
> now.
>
> Long gone are the days when we add ipv4 only implementations of
> protocols.
If nobody need it and no user in the near future out there, why should i
implement this? That is dogmatic only!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-11 16:48 [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol stefani
2011-01-11 17:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-11 20:50 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-11 20:52 ` David Miller
2011-01-11 21:14 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
2011-01-11 21:19 ` David Miller
2011-01-11 21:41 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-11 21:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-11 22:23 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-11 21:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-11 21:40 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-11 21:06 ` Eric Dumazet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-03 14:34 stefani
2011-01-02 22:39 stefani
2011-01-02 22:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-02 22:55 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 23:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-01-03 9:08 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-03 9:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-03 9:54 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-03 10:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-03 14:08 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 15:31 stefani
2011-01-02 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-02 19:48 ` Daniel Baluta
2011-01-02 21:33 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 21:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-01-02 19:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-01-02 21:46 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 22:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-01-02 22:21 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 20:16 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-01-02 21:37 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 21:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-02 22:16 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 22:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-01 21:44 stefani
2011-01-01 22:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-02 11:17 ` Stefani Seibold
2011-01-02 11:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-02 11:57 ` Stefani Seibold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294780480.17388.2.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=jochen@jochen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).