From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:14:40 +0100
Message-ID: <1294780480.17388.2.camel@wall-e>
References: <1294764515-15356-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net>
	 <1294765273.2927.65.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	 <1294779020.16410.2.camel@wall-e>
	 <20110111.125254.133402589.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	shemminger@vyatta.com, jj@chaosbits.net, daniel.baluta@gmail.com,
	jochen@jochen.org, hagen@jauu.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	pavel@ucw.cz
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110111.125254.133402589.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 12:52 -0800 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:50:20 +0100
> 
> > Right, but currently there is no need for an IPV6 implementation, non of
> > our base station provide it and non of our mobile network customers use
> > it.
> > 
> > If it will be required in the future it will be implemented.
> 
> We require that you implement the ipv6 side for the submission right
> now.
> 
> Long gone are the days when we add ipv4 only implementations of
> protocols.

If nobody need it and no user in the near future out there, why should i
implement this? That is dogmatic only!