From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove "no conntrack!" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:48:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1294937329.3570.304.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <4D2E1A74.5080102@netfilter.org> <1294917210.3570.48.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2EE09A.1010409@netfilter.org> <1294918365.3570.56.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2EE80B.6010707@netfilter.org> <1294925915.3570.87.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1294929579.3570.163.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D2F28B9.50407@netfilter.org> <4D2F29D6.3040600@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Netfilter Development Mailinglist , netdev , Patrick McHardy To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D2F29D6.3040600@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 =C3=A0 17:35 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso a =C3=A9= crit : > On 13/01/11 17:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On 13/01/11 15:39, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> Then, cluster match can be improved, I am sure you already have a = patch > >> for it. > >=20 > > what scenario could benefit from the destination-based hashing? >=20 > I'm telling this because it doesn't make too sense to me. Me too ;) But hash(source_IP, source_PORT) definitely make sense in some workloads. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html