From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: add Faraday FTMAC100 10/100 Ethernet driver Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:58:38 +0000 Message-ID: <1295290718.6264.19.camel@bwh-desktop> References: <1294919372-1904-1-git-send-email-ratbert.chuang@gmail.com> <1295256060-2091-1-git-send-email-ratbert.chuang@gmail.com> <1295285354.3335.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Po-Yu Chuang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ratbert@faraday-tech.com, joe@perches.com, dilinger@queued.net To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:6884 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752055Ab1AQS6m convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:58:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1295285354.3335.10.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 18:29 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le lundi 17 janvier 2011 =C3=A0 17:21 +0800, Po-Yu Chuang a =C3=A9cri= t : >=20 >=20 > > +static int ftmac100_rx_packet(struct ftmac100 *priv, int *processe= d) > > +{ > > + struct net_device *netdev =3D priv->netdev; > > + struct ftmac100_rxdes *rxdes; > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + int length; > > + int copied =3D 0; > > + int done =3D 0; > > + > > + rxdes =3D ftmac100_rx_locate_first_segment(priv); > > + if (!rxdes) > > + return 0; > > + > > + length =3D ftmac100_rxdes_frame_length(rxdes); > > + > > + netdev->stats.rx_packets++; > > + netdev->stats.rx_bytes +=3D length; > > + > > + if (unlikely(ftmac100_rx_packet_error(priv, rxdes))) { > > + ftmac100_rx_drop_packet(priv); > > + return 1; > > + } > > + > > + /* start processing */ > > + skb =3D netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length); > > + if (unlikely(!skb)) { > > + if (net_ratelimit()) > > + netdev_err(netdev, "rx skb alloc failed\n"); > > + > > + ftmac100_rx_drop_packet(priv); > > + return 1; > > + } > > + >=20 > Please dont increase rx_packets/rx_bytes before the > netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(). >=20 > In case of mem allocation failure, it would be better not pretending = we > handled a packet. > > drivers/net/r8169.c for example does the rx_packets/rx_bytes only if > packet is delivered to upper stack. That's news to me. I specifically advised Po-Yu Chuang to increment these earlier because my understanding is that all packets/bytes should be counted. And drivers which use hardware MAC stats will generally do that, so I really don't think it makes sense to make other drivers different deliberately. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.