From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: netfront: Drop GSO SKBs which do not have csum_blank.
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:43:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295689392.3693.153.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3A2BD2.5030802@goop.org>
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 00:58 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 05:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The Linux network stack expects all GSO SKBs to have ip_summed ==
> > CHECKSUM_PARTIAL (which implies that the frame contains a partial
> > checksum) and the Xen network ring protocol similarly expects an SKB
> > which has GSO set to also have NETRX_csum_blank (which also implies a
> > partial checksum). Therefore drop such frames on receive otherwise
> > they will trigger the warning in skb_gso_segment.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > index cdbeec9..8b8c480 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > @@ -836,6 +836,11 @@ static int handle_incoming_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> > dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> > continue;
> > }
> > + } else if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + packets_dropped++;
> > + dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> > + continue;
>
> This looks redundant; why not something like:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> index 47e6a71..c1b8f64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -852,13 +852,12 @@ static int handle_incoming_queue(struct net_device *dev,
> /* Ethernet work: Delayed to here as it peeks the header. */
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
>
> - if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
> - if (skb_checksum_setup(skb)) {
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - packets_dropped++;
> - dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> - continue;
> - }
> + if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ||
> + skb_checksum_setup(skb)) {
That drops non-partial skbs. However they are fine unless they also
claim to be gso.
Perhaps you meant "skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && !
skb_checksum_setup(skb)" which I think works but doesn't allow us to
correctly chain the gso check onto the else.
Ian.
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + packets_dropped++;
> + dev->stats.rx_errors++;
> + continue;
> }
>
> dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>
> Thanks,
> J
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-22 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 13:23 [PATCH] xen: netfront: Drop GSO SKBs which do not have csum_blank Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 11:46 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-22 0:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-22 9:43 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-01-24 17:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen: netfront: refactor code for checking validity of incoming skbs Ian Campbell
2011-01-25 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen: netfront: Drop GSO SKBs which do not have csum_blank Ian Campbell
2011-01-26 3:44 ` David Miller
2011-01-26 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-27 14:14 ` [PATCH] xen: netfront: handle incoming GSO SKBs which are not CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Ian Campbell
2011-01-27 22:23 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295689392.3693.153.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).