From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xen: netfront: refactor code for checking validity of incoming skbs
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:09:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295975400-538-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295975376.14780.6595.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Makes future additional validation clearer.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
index 546de57..4dc347b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
@@ -809,6 +809,18 @@ out:
return err;
}
+static int validate_incoming_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ /*
+ * If the SKB is partial then we must be able to setup the
+ * checksum fields in the skb.
+ */
+ if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && skb_checksum_setup(skb))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int handle_incoming_queue(struct net_device *dev,
struct sk_buff_head *rxq)
{
@@ -829,13 +841,11 @@ static int handle_incoming_queue(struct net_device *dev,
/* Ethernet work: Delayed to here as it peeks the header. */
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
- if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
- if (skb_checksum_setup(skb)) {
- kfree_skb(skb);
- packets_dropped++;
- dev->stats.rx_errors++;
- continue;
- }
+ if (!validate_incoming_skb(skb)) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ packets_dropped++;
+ dev->stats.rx_errors++;
+ continue;
}
dev->stats.rx_packets++;
--
1.5.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-05 13:23 [PATCH] xen: netfront: Drop GSO SKBs which do not have csum_blank Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 11:46 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-22 0:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-22 9:43 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-24 17:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-01-25 17:09 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-25 17:09 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-01-25 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Ian Campbell
2011-01-26 3:44 ` David Miller
2011-01-26 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-27 14:14 ` [PATCH] xen: netfront: handle incoming GSO SKBs which are not CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Ian Campbell
2011-01-27 22:23 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295975400-538-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).