From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net_sched: sch_mqprio: dont leak kernel memory Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:28:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1296077287.2631.9.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1296062517.2899.86.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1296063823.6115.37.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20110126.115530.226756606.davem@davemloft.net> <1296073390.2631.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1296077098.2448.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.r.fastabend@intel.com To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:33131 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753292Ab1AZV2L (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:28:11 -0500 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so1460651wwa.1 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:28:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1296077098.2448.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 =C3=A0 13:24 -0800, Joe Perches a =C3=A9cri= t : > Ugly maybe, but correct, definitely. > The same can not be said of the {0}. What about fixing real problems Joe ? Are you telling me I dont know C ?