From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:30:38 -0800
Message-ID: <1296163838.1640.53.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20110127193131.GD5228@redhat.com>
	 <1296157547.1640.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110127200548.GE5228@redhat.com>
	 <20110127.130240.104065182.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mst@redhat.com, steved@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110127.130240.104065182.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:02 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Interesting. Could this is be a variant of the now famuous
> bufferbloat then?
> 
> Sigh, bufferbloat is the new global warming... :-/ 

Yep, some places become colder, some other places become warmer; Same as
BW results, sometimes faster, sometimes slower. :)

Shirley