From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] fixing hw timestamping in igb Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:23:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1296775407.2698.10.camel@jtkirshe-MOBL1> References: <9D02360A-8016-4BCB-B14A-DAFE22EF558E@halon.se> Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-w2UnNZ22eDVmaxbVecgl" Cc: "Ronciak, John" , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Ohly, Patrick" To: Anders Berggren Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:8279 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752244Ab1BCXXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:23:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9D02360A-8016-4BCB-B14A-DAFE22EF558E@halon.se> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-w2UnNZ22eDVmaxbVecgl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 02:39 -0800, Anders Berggren wrote: > Hardware timestamping for Intel 82580 didn't work in either 2.6.36 or 2.6= .37. Comparing it to Intel's igb-2.4.12 I found that the timecounter_init c= lock/counter initialization was done too early.=20 >=20 > Anders Berggren > Halon Security Thanks Anders, I will add this patch to my queue of igb patches. --=-w2UnNZ22eDVmaxbVecgl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEbBAABAgAGBQJNSzjuAAoJECTsCADr/EWU9V4H+LTMfuXf86pjLGGjD8BTBlAe NRiUWubWQsD2DburCuGZ7GsLcsMSmSOffulpGmtGySKRIQ5SMYBkizG1fbYnaxrL ZHLmeVURqIDul2ExXdNrvGV9PcbqPkpBjriJ5/VmWiJTs5MhopTrsEkBeXRXY8Am aVn56bNi3GqDnpnCvaAYKd7r3ee01w4jxBI6Ac38ju9PBvIQKe0d0YJdThVaPgQh WcrLLRXlZziRY2GEpsyJMxxZh6q8Y3jNTHl5aMb6MD7L2xhfqLjJ1Mol6xhbY5/T CLg7mOecDz2dagsYaHhguhhcpY2nD6bvo3An+wiC0kGCiNJ5D2ukMcqQvsWgDw== =u2PP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-w2UnNZ22eDVmaxbVecgl--