From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] fixing hw timestamping in igb Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:56:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1297241801.17359.169.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <9D02360A-8016-4BCB-B14A-DAFE22EF558E@halon.se> <1296775407.2698.10.camel@jtkirshe-MOBL1> <331E9D4A-6738-405A-8457-14858D1072DA@halon.se> <98900162-6C81-4B10-87DD-F43B04DC3F71@halon.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Ronciak, John" , "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Anders Berggren Return-path: Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:3665 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752974Ab1BII4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2011 03:56:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <98900162-6C81-4B10-87DD-F43B04DC3F71@halon.se> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 09:24 +0100, Anders Berggren wrote: > Our hardware ping, using Intel 82580 NICs, > have an accuracy of 8 nanoseconds. Perhaps you mean 8 nanosecond resolution? Is documentation available for this claim?