From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH] cls_u32: fix sparse warnings Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:15 -0500 Message-ID: <1298508435.7672.0.camel@mojatatu> References: <20110220181423.492594b7@nehalam> <1298464542.2271.1.camel@mojatatu> <20110223101614.1cdc9d51@nehalam> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:53615 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754932Ab1BXArS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:18 -0500 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so4996iyb.19 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:47:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110223101614.1cdc9d51@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:16 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > With current sparse and net-next it comes up clean. weird. So _data has to be defined on the stack for sparse to complain? Another one is act_pedit.c cheers, jamal