netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: allan.stephens@windriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Stephens <Allan.Stephens@windriver.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/17] tipc: Fix print statements that assume pointers are 32-bit values
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:26:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298510805-20630-7-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298510805-20630-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

From: Allan Stephens <Allan.Stephens@windriver.com>

Corrects print statements that use %x to print pointer values to use
%p instead, so that 64-bit pointer values are displayed correctly.

Signed-off-by: Allan Stephens <Allan.Stephens@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
 net/tipc/link.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 3c1c28c..d586265 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -2983,9 +2983,9 @@ static void link_print(struct link *l_ptr, const char *str)
 		     != (l_ptr->out_queue_size - 1)) ||
 		    (l_ptr->last_out->next != NULL)) {
 			tipc_printf(buf, "\nSend queue inconsistency\n");
-			tipc_printf(buf, "first_out= %x ", l_ptr->first_out);
-			tipc_printf(buf, "next_out= %x ", l_ptr->next_out);
-			tipc_printf(buf, "last_out= %x ", l_ptr->last_out);
+			tipc_printf(buf, "first_out= %p ", l_ptr->first_out);
+			tipc_printf(buf, "next_out= %p ", l_ptr->next_out);
+			tipc_printf(buf, "last_out= %p ", l_ptr->last_out);
 		}
 	} else
 		tipc_printf(buf, "[]");
-- 
1.7.3.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-24  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  1:26 [PATCH net-next 00/17] TIPC: Another mixed bag of cleanups and bugfixes Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 01/17] tipc: Combine port structure with tipc_port structure Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 02/17] tipc: Combine bearer structure with tipc_bearer structure Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 03/17] tipc: Remove unused global variable tipc_user_count Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 04/17] tipc: Prevent invalid memory access when sending to configuration service Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 05/17] tipc: Improve handling of invalid link tolerance values Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 07/17] tipc: Clean out all remaining instances of #if 0'd unused code Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 08/17] tipc: Clean up tracking of node requesting a broadcast retransmit Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 09/17] tipc: Eliminate unnecessary locking when starting topology service Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 10/17] tipc: Improve accuracy of link transmit queue maximum size statistic Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 11/17] tipc: Set unused probe field of link protocol messages to defined value Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 12/17] tipc: Minor optimization to topology service connection establishment Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 13/17] tipc: Fix port counter handling to correct congestion control Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 14/17] tipc: Add in missing lock during link initialization Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 15/17] tipc: Remove support for per-connection message sequence numbering Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 16/17] tipc: Remove unused message header field for requested number of links Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  1:26 ` [PATCH net-next 17/17] tipc: Avoid reliable broadcast preparation for NACK messages Paul Gortmaker
2011-02-24  4:49 ` [PATCH net-next 00/17] TIPC: Another mixed bag of cleanups and bugfixes David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298510805-20630-7-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=allan.stephens@windriver.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).