From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: segoon@openwall.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
kaber@trash.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, therbert@google.com,
xiaosuo@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com, kees.cook@canonical.com,
eugene@redhat.com, dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:38:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298666310.2554.47.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298663585.2554.39.camel@bwh-desktop>
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 19:53 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 11:43 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:30:16 +0000
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 11:16 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > >> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> > >> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:07:59 +0000
> > >>
> > >> > You realise that module loading doesn't actually run in the context of
> > >> > request_module(), right?
> > >>
> > >> Why is that a barrier? We could simply pass a capability mask into
> > >> request_module if necessary.
> > >>
> > >> It's an implementation detail, and not a deterrant to my suggested
> > >> scheme.
> > >
> > > It's not an implementation detail. modprobe currently runs with full
> > > capabilities; your proposal requires its capabilities to be limited to
> > > those of the capabilities of the process that triggered the
> > > request_module() (plus, presumably, CAP_SYS_MODULE).
> >
> > The idea was that the kernel will be the entity that will inspect the
> > elf sections and validate the capability bits, not the userspace
> > module loader.
>
> Yes, I understand that.
>
> > Surely we if we can pass an arbitrary string out to the loading
> > process as part of the module loading context, we can pass along
> > capability bits as well.
>
> If you want insert_module() to be able to deny loading some modules
> based on the capabilities of the process calling request_module() then
> you either have to *reduce* the capabilities given to modprobe or create
> some extra process state, separate from the usual capability state,
> specifically for this purpose.
I bet something like this (plus Vasiliy's changes to static module
aliases) would cover 99.9% of legitimate uses of this feature:
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 54aaca6..0d09baa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1120,8 +1120,20 @@ void dev_load(struct net *net, const char *name)
dev = dev_get_by_name_rcu(net, name);
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (!dev && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
- request_module("%s", name);
+ if (!dev && capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+ /* Check whether the name looks like one that a net
+ * driver will generate initially. If not, require a
+ * module alias with a suitable prefix, so that this
+ * can't be used to load arbitrary modules.
+ */
+ if ((strncmp(name, "eth", 3) == 0 &&
+ isdigit((unsigned char)name[3])) ||
+ (strncmp(name, "wlan", 4) == 0 &&
+ isdigit((unsigned char)name[4])))
+ request_module("%s", name);
+ else
+ request_module("netdev-%s", name);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_load);
---
Note that we don't have to care about interfaces that get renamed from
eth%d or wlan%d, since renaming is triggered asynchronously and
therefore can't be used in conjunction with the auto-loading feature.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-25 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 15:12 module loading with CAP_NET_ADMIN Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-24 16:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 12:30 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 15:14 ` [PATCH] don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-02-25 17:47 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 17:48 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 18:47 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:02 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 19:05 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 19:16 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:30 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 19:43 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:53 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 20:37 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 20:38 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-02-25 20:59 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-02-27 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-28 9:29 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-02-28 9:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-28 19:23 ` David Miller
2011-03-01 19:48 ` [PATCH] net: " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-01 20:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-01 21:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 7:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-03-09 22:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-09 22:09 ` David Miller
2011-03-09 22:53 ` James Morris
2011-03-10 9:49 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 16:01 ` Kees Cook
2011-03-02 19:39 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 19:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 19:49 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 20:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 20:38 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 20:40 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-22 20:47 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-24 15:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 18:03 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-24 18:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-24 20:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 21:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-24 21:46 ` David Miller
2011-03-24 21:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 22:15 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-24 21:57 ` Greg KH
2011-03-26 10:35 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-27 11:44 ` [PATCH] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-27 23:18 ` David Miller
2011-02-27 23:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 15:29 ` module loading with CAP_NET_ADMIN Michael Tokarev
2011-02-25 15:57 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298666310.2554.47.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=eugene@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).