From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: QFQ - quick fair queue scheduler (v2) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:07:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1299143278.2983.1.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20110228171738.2cc8c9a0@nehalam> <20110302020610.GD1005@gandalf.sssup.it> <1299064667.2920.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110302081108.689571d8@nehalam> <1299082728.2920.18.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1299087087.2920.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110303081940.GA29685@gandalf.sssup.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , David Miller , Luigi Rizzo , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Valente To: Fabio Checconi Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:56339 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755465Ab1CCJID (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 04:08:03 -0500 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so882782fxm.19 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:08:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110303081940.GA29685@gandalf.sssup.it> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 =C3=A0 09:19 +0100, Fabio Checconi a =C3=A9crit : > The same bug you identified in qfq_reset_qdisc() is present also in > qfq_drop(), both loops need to be corrected... I dont think so, because in qfq_drop() we exit from qfq_drop() right after call to qfq_deactivate_class() But I agree code should be same ;)