From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: bonding... Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:46:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1299159991.4277.45.camel@localhost> References: <20110302.214910.112578818.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:58139 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756155Ab1CCNqe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:46:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110302.214910.112578818.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 21:49 -0800, David Miller wrote: [...] > This is unacceptable, people are submitting multiple bonding patches > every single day now. It needs a clueful bonding person looking at > these submissions on a constant basis. [...] And preferably saying 'no' to most new features... Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.