From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: xiaosuo@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: seqlock optimization
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:02:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299279759.2758.60.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110304.144448.115945732.davem@davemloft.net>
Le vendredi 04 mars 2011 à 14:44 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
> Applied, thanks Eric!
>
> With this and the following patch applied to my no-routing-cache tree,
> output route lookup on my Niagara2 is down to 2966 cycles! For reference
> with just the plain routing cache removal, it was as much as 3832 cycles.
>
> udpflood is a lot faster too, with plain routing cache removal it ran as:
>
> bash$ time ./bin/udpflood -l 10000000 10.2.2.11
> real 3m9.921s
> user 0m9.520s
> sys 3m0.440s
>
> But now it's:
>
> bash$ time ./bin/udpflood -l 10000000 10.2.2.11
> real 2m45.903s
> user 0m8.640s
> sys 2m37.280s
>
> :-)
>
Nice indeed :)
> --------------------
> ipv4: Optimize flow initialization in output route lookup.
>
> We burn a lot of useless cycles, cpu store buffer traffic, and
> memory operations memset()'ing the on-stack flow used to perform
> output route lookups in __ip_route_output_key().
>
> Only the first half of the flow object members even matter for
> output route lookups in this context, specifically:
>
> FIB rules matching cares about:
>
> dst, src, tos, iif, oif, mark
>
> FIB trie lookup cares about:
>
> dst
>
> FIB semantic match cares about:
>
> tos, scope, oif
>
> Therefore only initialize these specific members and elide the
> memset entirely.
>
> On Niagara2 this kills about ~300 cycles from the output route
> lookup path.
>
> Likely, we can take things further, since all callers of output
> route lookups essentially throw away the on-stack flow they use.
> So they don't care if we use it as a scratch-pad to compute the
> final flow key.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
> net/ipv4/route.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 04b8954..e3a5a89 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -1670,14 +1670,7 @@ static struct rtable *__mkroute_output(const struct fib_result *res,
> struct rtable *__ip_route_output_key(struct net *net, const struct flowi *oldflp)
> {
> u32 tos = RT_FL_TOS(oldflp);
> - struct flowi fl = { .fl4_dst = oldflp->fl4_dst,
> - .fl4_src = oldflp->fl4_src,
> - .fl4_tos = tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK,
> - .fl4_scope = ((tos & RTO_ONLINK) ?
> - RT_SCOPE_LINK : RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE),
> - .mark = oldflp->mark,
> - .iif = net->loopback_dev->ifindex,
> - .oif = oldflp->oif };
> + struct flowi fl;
> struct fib_result res;
> unsigned int flags = 0;
> struct net_device *dev_out = NULL;
> @@ -1688,6 +1681,15 @@ struct rtable *__ip_route_output_key(struct net *net, const struct flowi *oldflp
> res.r = NULL;
> #endif
>
> + fl.oif = oldflp->oif;
> + fl.iif = net->loopback_dev->ifindex;
> + fl.mark = oldflp->mark;
> + fl.fl4_dst = oldflp->fl4_dst;
> + fl.fl4_src = oldflp->fl4_src;
> + fl.fl4_tos = tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK;
> + fl.fl4_scope = ((tos & RTO_ONLINK) ?
> + RT_SCOPE_LINK : RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE);
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (oldflp->fl4_src) {
> rth = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-03 4:45 inetpeer with create==0 David Miller
2011-03-03 5:30 ` Changli Gao
2011-03-03 5:36 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 6:27 ` Changli Gao
2011-03-03 6:42 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 7:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-03 8:32 ` David Miller
2011-03-04 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: seqlock optimization Eric Dumazet
2011-03-04 19:17 ` David Miller
2011-03-04 20:45 ` David Miller
2011-03-04 22:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-04 22:44 ` David Miller
2011-03-04 23:02 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-03-03 8:07 ` inetpeer with create==0 Changli Gao
2011-03-03 8:34 ` David Miller
2011-03-03 6:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-03 8:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299279759.2758.60.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox