From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shirley Ma Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:57:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1299621444.25664.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20110127.130240.104065182.davem@davemloft.net> <20110202044222.GC3818@redhat.com> <201102091107.20270.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Krishna Kumar2 , David Miller , kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, steved@us.ibm.com To: Rusty Russell Return-path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:45665 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261Ab1CHV52 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:57:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201102091107.20270.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 11:07 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > I've finally read this thread... I think we need to get more serious > with our stats gathering to diagnose these kind of performance issues. > > This is a start; it should tell us what is actually happening to the > virtio ring(s) without significant performance impact... Should we also add similar stat on vhost vq as well for monitoring vhost_signal & vhost_notify? Shirley