From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, steved@us.ibm.com,
Tom Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets - continued
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:38:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299688682.25664.111.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110309163201.GC7165@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:32 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think your issues are with TX overrun.
> Besides delaying IRQ on TX, I don't have many ideas.
>
> The one interesting thing is that you see better speed
> if you drop packets. netdev crowd says this should not happen,
> so could be an indicator of a problem somewhere.
Yes, I am looking at why guest didn't see see used_buffers on time from
vhost send TX completion I am trying to collect some data on vhost.
I also wonder whether it's a scheduler issue.
Thanks
Shirley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-09 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201103071631.41964.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2011-03-09 7:15 ` Network performance with small packets - continued Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20110309071558.GA25757@redhat.com>
2011-03-09 15:45 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 16:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 16:25 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 16:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 16:38 ` Shirley Ma [this message]
2011-03-09 16:09 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-09 16:21 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 16:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 16:51 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 17:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 18:16 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 22:51 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-09 20:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-09 21:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-09 23:25 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-10 6:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-10 15:23 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-10 15:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-10 17:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-18 15:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2011-03-10 0:59 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-10 2:30 ` Rick Jones
2011-03-09 22:45 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-09 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299688682.25664.111.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=steved@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).