From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [GIT/PATCH v4] xen network backend driver Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:30:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1299839404.17339.1893.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <1299776554.17339.824.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110310091425.3451f7f1@nehalam> <1299777438.2807.0.camel@bwh-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , xen-devel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Herbert Xu , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Francois Romieu To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:55677 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751593Ab1CKKaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:30:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1299777438.2807.0.camel@bwh-desktop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 17:17 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:14 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:02:33 +0000 > > Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > + /* Flags that must not be set in dev->features */ > > > + int features_disabled; > > > > dev->features is unsigned long, so this mask should be as well. > > It's u32 now. That's in net-next only but I think there's no harm in making it u32 in my netback branch (which is based on a tree which uses unsigned long). Then it will be correct when merged. Alternatively I could pull net-next into my branch but I don't think that's necessary in this case. Ian.