From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE inconsistency between IPv4 and IPv6 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:54:33 +0000 Message-ID: <1300438473.16342.18.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <1300357750.2589.46.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <4D82B4DB.2060006@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Yuniverg, Michael" , "Yedvab, Nadav" To: Brian Haley Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:51296 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756383Ab1CRIyg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 04:54:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4D82B4DB.2060006@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 21:26 -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > Hmm, "connection refused", do you have any iptables rules installed? Connecting > to a local global address worked fine for me on 2.6.32-30 using a home-grown > test app. Thanks for looking at this. Just to confirm... after your server does SO_BINDTODEVICE to 'lo', your clients on the same host can make a successful connection to global IPv6 addresses which are assigned to the *other* interfaces? Can you show your version of the test app, and your results? What kernel is this on? -- dwmw2