From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: remove send completion interrupts and avoid TX queue overrun through packet drop
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:54:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300467242.3441.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110318131558.GC4221@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:15 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Is this the local or remote throughput?
> With UDP_STREAM you are mostly interested in
> remote throughput, local one can be pretty high
> while most packets get dropped.
This is local throughput. Remote is called recv(netserver) data. With
default wmem/rmem, there are so many recv errors. I haven't tuned the
results yet.
Thanks
Shirley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-17 0:12 [PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: remove send completion interrupts and avoid TX queue overrun through packet drop Shirley Ma
2011-03-17 5:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-17 15:18 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 3:28 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 13:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-18 16:54 ` Shirley Ma [this message]
2011-03-17 5:10 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-17 15:10 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-18 13:33 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-19 1:41 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-21 18:03 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-22 11:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-23 2:26 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 0:30 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-24 4:14 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-24 17:46 ` Shirley Ma
2011-03-24 18:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-03-25 4:51 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-25 4:50 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-27 7:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-04 6:13 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-24 0:16 ` Rusty Russell
2011-03-24 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300467242.3441.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).