From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/36] scsi,rcu: convert call_rcu(fc_rport_free_rcu) to kfree_rcu() Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:05:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1300889151.15899.4.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <4D82D071.5020703@cn.fujitsu.com> <4D82D3FF.2080303@cn.fujitsu.com> <4D82D45A.30102@cn.fujitsu.com> <1300814913.19083.427.camel@fritz> <20110323065014.GU2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Love , Lai Jiangshan , Ingo Molnar , Jens Axboe , Neil Horman , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , "Pekka Savola (ipv6)" , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Eric Dumazet , Stephen Hemminger , Tejun Heo , Jarek Poplawski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@open-fcoe.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110323065014.GU2322@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 23:50 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > The kfree_rcu() definition is as > follows: > > #define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head) \ > __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head)) Isn't this one of those cases where the obvious use of the interface is definitely wrong? It's also another nasty pseudo C prototype. I know we do this sort of thing for container_of et al, but I don't really think we want to extend it. Why not make the interface take a pointer to the embedding structure and one to the rcu_head ... that way all pointer mathematics can be contained inside the RCU routines. James