From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 08/16] mlx4_en: Reporting HW revision in ethtool -i Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:40:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1300938019.26693.528.camel@localhost> References: <4D89B16F.4040008@mellanox.co.il> <1300889054.26693.527.camel@localhost> <953B660C027164448AE903364AC447D20705BE28@mtldag01.mtl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Eugenia Emantayev To: Yevgeny Petrilin Return-path: Received: from exchange.solarflare.com ([216.237.3.220]:24929 "EHLO exchange.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933081Ab1CXDkX (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <953B660C027164448AE903364AC447D20705BE28@mtldag01.mtl.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:10 +0000, Yevgeny Petrilin wrote: > > > > This is an abuse of the ethtool_drvinfo::driver field. > > > > Your users can use lspci -v, can't they? > > > I don't think there is a problem here. > We have always reported the HW model via Ethtool, we just expanded the information > we provide. > Our users prefer to see the information in ethtool. I can provide a patch for David if you won't. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.