From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru, arnd@arndb.de,
mirqus@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
therbert@google.com, xiaosuo@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com,
kees.cook@canonical.com, eugene@redhat.com,
dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:03:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300989839.2398.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324153714.GB2648@peq.hallyn.com>
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 10:37 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Eric Paris (eparis@parisplace.org):
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com> wrote:
> ...
> > This patch is causing a bit of a problem in Fedora. The problem lies
>
> Sorry, what exactly is the problem it is causing? I gather it's
> spitting out printks? What exactly do the printks say? The patch
> included at bottom checks for CAP_NET_ADMIN before checking for
> CAP_SYS_MODULE, so these must be cases which historically always
> quietly failed, and are now hitting the 'pr_err' which this patch
> adds?
Not quite. SELinux logs every time an operation is denied. This patch
means that every time a module is requested which does not exist as
netdev-* we check CAP_SYS_MODULE. SELinux does not allow CAP_SYS_MODULE
and thus we get SELinux complaining that tasks are trying to load
modules. I do have one report from a user who claims this is breaking
his system, but I'm not sure I believe him as I have yet to see any
dmesg printk from the pr_err.
On my local system reproduce the SELinux denials on every boot as
something tries to autoload "reg", "wifi0", and "virbr0". I have no
modules which match these. Thus the first try for CAP_NET_ADMIN
+netdev-wifi0 fails. We then hit the CAP_SYS_MODULE check which SELinux
rejects and puts up a huge warning that someone is trying to load code
into the kernel. Big red flags. Even in permissive, where the
capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE) passes, we won't hit the pr_err() since there is
not module for "wifi"
I think there are 3 possibilities:
Change SELinux policy so as to not complain when udev/NM/libvirt try to
check CAP_SYS_MODULE, but that's a bad idea, since if they every try to
use init_module(2) we won't get denials.
Change this callsite to a _noaudit check. Which is better than above
but still not great since we wouldn't get a denial log if anybody had
tried to load xfs....
Figure out a way to stop the calls to "reg" "wifi0" and "virbr0" if they
don't exist.
I feel like the last one is the best way, but I don't know what a
solution could look like....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 15:12 module loading with CAP_NET_ADMIN Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-24 16:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 12:30 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 15:14 ` [PATCH] don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-02-25 17:47 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 17:48 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 18:47 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:02 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-25 19:05 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 19:16 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:30 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 19:43 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 19:53 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 20:37 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 20:38 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-25 20:59 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-02-27 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-28 9:29 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-02-28 9:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-28 19:23 ` David Miller
2011-03-01 19:48 ` [PATCH] net: " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-01 20:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-01 21:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 7:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-03-09 22:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-09 22:09 ` David Miller
2011-03-09 22:53 ` James Morris
2011-03-10 9:49 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 16:01 ` Kees Cook
2011-03-02 19:39 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 19:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 19:49 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 20:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-03-02 20:38 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-02 20:40 ` Jake Edge
2011-03-22 20:47 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-24 15:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 18:03 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2011-03-24 18:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-24 20:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 21:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-24 21:46 ` David Miller
2011-03-24 21:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2011-03-24 22:15 ` Eric Paris
2011-03-24 21:57 ` Greg KH
2011-03-26 10:35 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-27 11:44 ` [PATCH] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-02-27 23:18 ` David Miller
2011-02-27 23:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-25 15:29 ` module loading with CAP_NET_ADMIN Michael Tokarev
2011-02-25 15:57 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300989839.2398.17.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=eugene@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).