From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Handle gso packets in dev_forward_skb Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1301340048.2506.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1300743744.2837.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110327.180922.59673799.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, greearb@candelatech.com, arnd@arndb.de, kaber@trash.net, Daniel Lezcano To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:38403 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089Ab1C1TUy (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:20:54 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so2932416fxm.19 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110327.180922.59673799.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le dimanche 27 mars 2011 =C3=A0 18:09 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9crit = : > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:00:56 -0700 >=20 > > Eric Dumazet writes: > >=20 > >> Hmm, did you follow http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/86815/ > >> discussion ? > >=20 > > No. It seems I missed it, but I do have the same problem, and > > essentially the same fix.=20 >=20 > Can someone work on getting this straightened out and resubmit the > final patch so I can apply something? >=20 Apparently Daniel is busy. I guess we can use Eric B. patch, then ?