Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Fix build failure when ipv6 but xt_tproxy is built in
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302014626.67568.1.camel@nienna.balabit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D99CDA0.3030305@trash.net>

Hi,

On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:54 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >> net/built-in.o: In function `tproxy_tg6_v1':
> >> /home/rostedt/work/autotest/nobackup/linux-test.git/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c:288: undefined reference to `ipv6_find_hdr'
> >>
> >> This happened because the xt_TPROXY code was compiled into the kernel
> >> proper, but the ipv6 netfilter was compiled as a module. The fix is to
> >> only enter the code that calls ipv6_find_hdr if ipv6 netfilter is
> >> compiled into the kernel, or if it is a module, so is the xt_TPROXY
> >> code.
> 
> I don't think this is a good fix for the problem since it may lead to
> the confusing situation that both TPROXY and ip6tables are enabled,
> but TPROXY has no IPv6 support.
> 
> I think we should solve this by either adding a Kconfig dependency
> on (IP6_NF_IPTABLES || IP6_NF_IPTABLES=n) or using ipv6_skip_exthdr()
> instead of ipv6_find_hdr().
> 
> Krisztian, what do you think?

I'd definitely prefer using ipv6_skip_exthdr() instead of playing
various tricks with the config preprocessor macros.

What about something like this?

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
index dcfd57e..1ef0e56 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
@@ -283,10 +283,10 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
        const struct in6_addr *laddr;
        __be16 lport;
        int thoff;
-       int tproto;
+       u8 tproto = iph->nexthdr;
 
-       tproto = ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &thoff, -1, NULL);
-       if (tproto < 0) {
+       thoff = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, sizeof(*iph), &tproto);
+       if (thoff < 0) {
                pr_debug("unable to find transport header in IPv6 packet, dropping\n");
                return NF_DROP;
        }

--
KOVACS Krisztian

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1301451199.14261.327.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
2011-03-30  5:35 ` [PATCH] netfilter: Fix build failure when ipv6 but xt_tproxy is built in David Miller
2011-03-30 10:18   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-04 13:54   ` Patrick McHardy
2011-04-05 14:43     ` KOVACS Krisztian [this message]
2011-04-05 14:49       ` Patrick McHardy
2011-04-06 12:08         ` KOVACS Krisztian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302014626.67568.1.camel@nienna.balabit \
    --to=hidden@balabit.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox