From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com>
Cc: Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@qlogic.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Ameen Rahman <ameen.rahman@qlogic.com>,
Sucheta Chakraborty <sucheta.chakraborty@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethtool support to configure number of channels
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:18:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302128288.2840.72.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BEEA5B09-0726-463D-B542-234C4FB49FC5@qlogic.com>
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 22:47 -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 21:36 -0500, Amit Salecha wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure why you reduced this to a single count. If if the driver
> >>> or hardware doesn't allow certain combinations of counts, it might be
> >>> necessary to configure several types at the same time
> >>>
> >>>> +/* Channel ID is made up of a type */
> >>>> +enum ethtool_channel_id {
> >>>> + ETH_CHAN_TYPE_RX = 0x1,
> >>>> + ETH_CHAN_TYPE_TX = 0x2
> >>>> +};
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> enum ethtool_channel_id was meant to be an identifier of a specific
> >>> channel. An enumeration of channel types should be named differently.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will name it as ethtool_channel_type. Any other suggestion ?
> >>
> >>> This also omits the 'combined' and 'other' types. Most multiqueue
> >>> drivers pair up RX and TX queues so that most channels combine RX and
> >>> TX
> >>> work.
> >>
> >> 'combined' is ok, what is use of 'other' ?
> >
> > Could be link interrupts, SR-IOV coordination, or something else. Not
> > something you'd likely be able to change, but it could be useful to know
> > that some interrupts are allocated to them. Actually, that does mean it
> > might be helpful for the 'get' operation to return a minimum value along
> > with the maximum value.
>
> Are you thinking of using the 'other' field as a way to a represent a 'virtual port'
> that a VF could have. A virtual port could have a set of rx/tx rings, interrupts,
> QoS parameters, MAC filters, VLAN ids etc. etc. A VF could have one or many such
> channels. If thats the case, I would think that configuring these channels should
> be done via a PF rather than on a VF. It is possible I could get you totally wrong here,
> however it would be good to hear your thoughts.
The net device for a VF could have all sorts of channels, and their
numbers may or may not be configurable depending on limitations of the
hardware, firmware, driver or hypervisor.
The channel counts reported by a net device should include all those
IRQs allocated by the net device driver for its parent device (e.g. a
PCI device).
To be more concrete, here is how I would count channels:
1. RX queue with IRQ, exposed to the network stack => RX channel
2. TX queue with IRQ, exposed to the network stack => TX channel
3. RX and TX queue sharing IRQ, exposed to the network stack => combined channel
4. Link change IRQ => other channel
5. Queue(s) and IRQ for iSCSI traffic, not exposed to the network stack => other channel
6. Qeuue(s) and IRQ for coordination between PCI functions => other channel
7. Queue(s) and IRQ allocated to other PCI function => not counted
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 10:01 [PATCH] net: ethtool support to configure number of channels Amit Kumar Salecha
2011-04-01 17:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-02 2:36 ` Amit Salecha
2011-04-02 2:55 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-02 3:13 ` Amit Salecha
2011-04-02 3:22 ` Amit Salecha
2011-04-02 5:47 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2011-04-06 22:18 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302128288.2840.72.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=ameen.rahman@qlogic.com \
--cc=amit.salecha@qlogic.com \
--cc=anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sucheta.chakraborty@qlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox