public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Lübbe" <jluebbe@debian.org>
Cc: Scot Doyle <lkml@scotdoyle.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel panic when using bridge
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:15:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302614145.3233.47.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302613353.30934.22.camel@polaris.local>

Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 15:02 +0200, Jan Lübbe a écrit :
> Hi! 
> 
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Considering recent changes in ip_options_echo() I would suggest to add
> > following patch and/or revert commit 8628bd8af7c4c14f40
> > (ipv4: Fix IP timestamp option (IPOPT_TS_PRESPEC) handling in
> > ip_options_echo())
> 
> I've read this thread, but I'm not sure why my patch is related to these
> kernel panics. The behavior is only changed for packets with the
> timestamp option in prespecified addresses mode. Even then, it shouldn't
> cause ip_options_build to write to unallocated memory later.
> 
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_options.c b/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > index 28a736f..35f2bf9 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_options.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ int ip_options_echo(struct ip_options * dopt, struct sk_buff * skb)
> >                 *dptr++ = IPOPT_END;
> >                 dopt->optlen++;
> >         }
> > +       if (unlikely(dopt->optlen > 40)) {
> > +               pr_err("ip_options_echo() fatal error optlen=%u > 40\n", dopt->optlen);
> > +               print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "ip options: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
> > +                       16, 1, dopt->__data, dopt->optlen, false);
> > +       }
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Here you check dopt->optlen, which certainly should be 40 at most. The
> calculation of dopt->optlen wasn't changed by my patch, though.

Check again the thread Jan.

Scot is using a tool (IP Stack Checker's tcpsic) to forge random tcp
packets.

Maybe your patch is fine but requires a change in a previous function,
to make sure we deny some crazy packet before generating an ip_options
with more than 40 bytes, in an icmp_send() reply.

I took a look at this ip_options stuff and must say its really hard to
even _read_ the code. Understanding it might need several days or a new
brain ?

I cannot Ack or Nack your patch, I must admit it. Isnt it frightening ?




  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-08  1:20 Kernel panic when using bridge Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 13:49 ` Sebastian Nickel
2011-04-08 14:57   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-08 19:12     ` Pallai Roland
2011-04-08 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-09  4:51   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-09  7:19     ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-11 23:48       ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  1:31         ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-12  3:47           ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  4:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  4:22               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  5:17                 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  5:51                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  7:02                     ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-12  7:31                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12  8:39                         ` [PATCH] inetpeer: reduce stack usage Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 14:51                           ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-12 14:55                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:58                               ` David Miller
2011-04-12 11:49                       ` Kernel panic when using bridge Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 13:02                         ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 13:15                           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-04-12 14:19                             ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 14:49                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 15:13                                 ` Jan Lübbe
2011-04-12 16:14                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:20                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-12 16:35                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 16:45                                         ` Bandan Das
2011-04-12 16:54                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 17:18                                             ` [PATCH] bridge: reset IPCB in br_parse_ip_options Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 20:39                                               ` David Miller
2011-04-12 23:55                                               ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13  4:12                                                 ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:10                                                   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:24                                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-13 15:54                                                       ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-13 15:28                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 21:48                                                       ` David Miller
2011-04-14  0:03                                                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  0:05                                                           ` David Miller
2011-04-14  0:08                                                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  2:31                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  2:54                                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-14  3:03                                                             ` [PATCH] ip: ip_options_compile() resilient to NULL skb route Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  3:30                                                               ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14  3:37                                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  4:15                                                                   ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-14 13:34                                                                     ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 15:55                                                                 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 22:02                                                                   ` Scot Doyle
2011-04-14 22:04                                                                     ` David Miller
2011-04-14 23:20                                                                   ` Hiroaki SHIMODA
2011-04-15  6:26                                                                     ` David Miller
2011-04-12 16:32                                     ` Kernel panic when using bridge Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302614145.3233.47.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jluebbe@debian.org \
    --cc=lkml@scotdoyle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=shimoda.hiroaki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox