From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com
Subject: [PATCH net-2.6 3/3] sfc: Use rmb() to ensure reads occur in order
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:50:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302652234.2880.31.camel@bwh-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302652065.2880.28.camel@bwh-desktop>
From: Neil Turton <nturton@solarflare.com>
Enabling write-combining may also enable read reordering. The BIU is
only guaranteed to read from a 128-bit CSR or 64-bit SRAM word when
the host reads from its lowest address; otherwise the BIU may use the
latched value. Therefore we need to reinstate the read memory
barriers after the first read operation for each CSR or SRAM word.
Signed-off-by; Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/io.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/io.h b/drivers/net/sfc/io.h
index d9d8c2e..cc97880 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/io.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/io.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ static inline void efx_reado(struct efx_nic *efx, efx_oword_t *value,
spin_lock_irqsave(&efx->biu_lock, flags);
value->u32[0] = _efx_readd(efx, reg + 0);
+ rmb();
value->u32[1] = _efx_readd(efx, reg + 4);
value->u32[2] = _efx_readd(efx, reg + 8);
value->u32[3] = _efx_readd(efx, reg + 12);
@@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ static inline void efx_sram_readq(struct efx_nic *efx, void __iomem *membase,
value->u64[0] = (__force __le64)__raw_readq(membase + addr);
#else
value->u32[0] = (__force __le32)__raw_readl(membase + addr);
+ rmb();
value->u32[1] = (__force __le32)__raw_readl(membase + addr + 4);
#endif
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&efx->biu_lock, flags);
--
1.7.4
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 23:47 pull request: sfc-2.6 2011-04-13 Ben Hutchings
2011-04-12 23:49 ` [PATCH net-2.6 1/3] sfc: Stop the TX queues during loopback self-tests Ben Hutchings
2011-04-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-2.6 2/3] sfc: Do not use efx_process_channel_now() in online self-test Ben Hutchings
2011-04-12 23:50 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-04-13 0:12 ` pull request: sfc-2.6 2011-04-13 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302652234.2880.31.camel@bwh-desktop \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).