From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 33502] New: Caught 64-bit read from uninitialized memory in __alloc_skb Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1303309591.3186.84.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20110418153852.153d3ed3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1303181466.4152.39.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303182557.4152.48.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303183217.4152.49.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303244270.2756.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4DAE7579.3020400@cs.helsinki.fi> <1303279470.2756.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303285519.4dae8f0fdf9b1@imp.free.fr> <4DAE901C.2090809@cs.helsinki.fi> <1303286998.3186.18.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303290464.3186.32.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1303293765.3186.74.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Pekka Enberg , casteyde.christian@free.fr, Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Vegard Nossum To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:47792 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752944Ab1DTO0g (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:26:36 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so4126556wwk.1 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:26:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 =C3=A0 09:05 -0500, Christoph Lameter a =C3=A9= crit : > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote: >=20 > > > Then, just disable SLUB_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE if KMEMCHECK is defined, a= s I did in my first patch. >=20 > Ok your first patch seems to be the sanest approach. >=20 > > { > > @@ -1889,16 +1895,18 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(str= uct kmem_cache *s, > > struct kmem_cache_cpu *c; > > #ifdef CONFIG_CMPXCHG_LOCAL > > unsigned long tid; > > -#else > > +#endif > > +#ifdef MASK_IRQ_IN_SLAB_ALLOC > > unsigned long flags; > > #endif > > >=20 > Yea well that does not bring us much. Well, we keep the fast free path ? only slab_alloc() would have to disable irqs for ~20 instructions.