* how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 @ 2011-04-26 2:19 zhou rui 2011-04-26 2:57 ` Ben Hutchings 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev hi here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel 82599? for example I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated? ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 0 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0020 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 1 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0040 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 2 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0060 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 3 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0080 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 4 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x00A0 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 5 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x00C0 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 6 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x00E0 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 user-def-mask 0x0 action 6 thanks rui ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 2:19 how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 2:57 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 3:39 ` zhou rui 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhou rui; +Cc: netdev On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:19 +0800, zhou rui wrote: > hi > here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel > 82599? for example > I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue > 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work > > don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated? > > ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on > > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 > dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 > dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 > user-def-mask 0x0 action 0 [...] This specifies a filter for UDP/IPv4 packets, and the masks are wrong. If you actually wanted to filter only UDP/IPv4 packets for VID 0-31 then the correct syntax would be: ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 0 vlan-mask 0xf01f If you don't care about the layer 3/4 protocols then you would need to use 'flow-type ether', but no driver implements that yet. (Well, sfc implements the *type*, but not filtering by VID only.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 2:57 ` Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 3:39 ` zhou rui 2011-04-26 3:51 ` Ben Hutchings 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: netdev On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:19 +0800, zhou rui wrote: >> hi >> here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel >> 82599? for example >> I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue >> 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work >> >> don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated? >> >> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on >> >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 >> dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 >> dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 >> user-def-mask 0x0 action 0 > [...] > > This specifies a filter for UDP/IPv4 packets, and the masks are wrong. > If you actually wanted to filter only UDP/IPv4 packets for VID 0-31 then > the correct syntax would be: > > ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 0 vlan-mask 0xf01f > > If you don't care about the layer 3/4 protocols then you would need to > use 'flow-type ether', but no driver implements that yet. (Well, sfc > implements the *type*, but not filtering by VID only.) > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare > Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. > They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. > > hi ben,thanks for your help,would you mind tell me "32~63" VID filter? still can not understand the vlan-mask ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 3:39 ` zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 3:51 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 4:39 ` zhou rui 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 3:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhou rui; +Cc: netdev On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:39 +0800, zhou rui wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings > <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:19 +0800, zhou rui wrote: > >> hi > >> here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel > >> 82599? for example > >> I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue > >> 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work > >> > >> don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated? > >> > >> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on > >> > >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 > >> dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 > >> dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 > >> user-def-mask 0x0 action 0 > > [...] > > > > This specifies a filter for UDP/IPv4 packets, and the masks are wrong. > > If you actually wanted to filter only UDP/IPv4 packets for VID 0-31 then > > the correct syntax would be: > > > > ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 0 vlan-mask 0xf01f > > > > If you don't care about the layer 3/4 protocols then you would need to > > use 'flow-type ether', but no driver implements that yet. (Well, sfc > > implements the *type*, but not filtering by VID only.) [...] > hi ben,thanks for your help,would you mind tell me "32~63" VID filter? > still can not understand the vlan-mask The vlan-mask specifies tag bits to be ignored. You want to ignore the priority, CFI and lower 5 bits of the VID, hence 0xf01f. For a different group of 32 VIDs you would only change the vlan argument, not the vlan-mask argument. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 3:51 ` Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 4:39 ` zhou rui 2011-04-26 13:31 ` Ben Hutchings 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: netdev On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:39 +0800, zhou rui wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Ben Hutchings >> <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:19 +0800, zhou rui wrote: >> >> hi >> >> here is the problem troubles me,how to set vlan filter for intel >> >> 82599? for example >> >> I want vlan id 0~31 will go to queue 0, vlan id 32-63 will go to queue >> >> 1...below is my setting,but doesn't work >> >> >> >> don't know the exact meanning of the vlan-mask and vlan,how are they calculated? >> >> >> >> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on >> >> >> >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 src-ip 0x0 src-ip-mask 0x0 dst-ip 0x0 >> >> dst-ip-mask 0x0 src-port 0x0 src-port-mask 0x0 dst-port 0x0 >> >> dst-port-mask 0x0 vlan 0x0000 vlan-mask 0x00E0 user-def 0x0 >> >> user-def-mask 0x0 action 0 >> > [...] >> > >> > This specifies a filter for UDP/IPv4 packets, and the masks are wrong. >> > If you actually wanted to filter only UDP/IPv4 packets for VID 0-31 then >> > the correct syntax would be: >> > >> > ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 0 vlan-mask 0xf01f >> > >> > If you don't care about the layer 3/4 protocols then you would need to >> > use 'flow-type ether', but no driver implements that yet. (Well, sfc >> > implements the *type*, but not filtering by VID only.) > [...] >> hi ben,thanks for your help,would you mind tell me "32~63" VID filter? >> still can not understand the vlan-mask > > The vlan-mask specifies tag bits to be ignored. You want to ignore the > priority, CFI and lower 5 bits of the VID, hence 0xf01f. For a > different group of 32 VIDs you would only change the vlan argument, not > the vlan-mask argument. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare > Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. > They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. > > i set the filter like below: for a vlanid=50, it always match the last rule (action 7) ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple off ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 I tried the latest ixgbe driver 3.3.9, it reports: Cannot add new RX n-tuple filter: Operation not permitted ./ethtool -V ethtool version 2.6.36 thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 4:39 ` zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 13:31 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 15:22 ` Alexander Duyck 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhou rui; +Cc: netdev, e1000-devel On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:39 +0800, zhou rui wrote: [...] > i set the filter like below: > > for a vlanid=50, it always match the last rule (action 7) > > ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple off > ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 > > I tried the latest ixgbe driver 3.3.9, it reports: > > Cannot add new RX n-tuple filter: Operation not permitted > > ./ethtool -V > ethtool version 2.6.36 Check dmesg; there should be an error message there. Of course the error code should be EINVAL and not EPERM. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 13:31 ` Ben Hutchings @ 2011-04-26 15:22 ` Alexander Duyck 2011-04-26 15:30 ` zhou rui 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Duyck @ 2011-04-26 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Hutchings Cc: zhou rui, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On 4/26/2011 6:31 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:39 +0800, zhou rui wrote: > [...] >> i set the filter like below: >> >> for a vlanid=50, it always match the last rule (action 7) >> >> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple off >> ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 >> ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 >> >> I tried the latest ixgbe driver 3.3.9, it reports: >> >> Cannot add new RX n-tuple filter: Operation not permitted >> >> ./ethtool -V >> ethtool version 2.6.36 > > Check dmesg; there should be an error message there. Of course the > error code should be EINVAL and not EPERM. > > Ben. > The problem is likely the vlan-mask. The only valid VLAN masks supported are 0xFFFF, 0x0FFF, 0xF000, and 0x0000. The hardware cannot partially mask either the priority nor the VLAN TCI. Thanks, Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 2011-04-26 15:22 ` Alexander Duyck @ 2011-04-26 15:30 ` zhou rui 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: zhou rui @ 2011-04-26 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Duyck Cc: Ben Hutchings, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tuesday, April 26, 2011, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote: > On 4/26/2011 6:31 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 12:39 +0800, zhou rui wrote: > [...] > > i set the filter like below: > > for a vlanid=50, it always match the last rule (action 7) > > ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple off > ./ethtool -K eth5 ntuple on > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 32 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 1 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type udp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 > ./ethtool -U eth5 flow-type tcp4 vlan 64 vlan-mask 0xF01F action 7 > > I tried the latest ixgbe driver 3.3.9, it reports: > > Cannot add new RX n-tuple filter: Operation not permitted > > ./ethtool -V > ethtool version 2.6.36 > > > Check dmesg; there should be an error message there. Of course the > error code should be EINVAL and not EPERM. > > Ben. > > > > The problem is likely the vlan-mask. The only valid VLAN masks supported are 0xFFFF, 0x0FFF, 0xF000, and 0x0000. The hardware cannot partially mask either the priority nor the VLAN TCI. > > Thanks, > > Alex > Yes i just checked the log, it said partially vlan Id not support, that means I can't set this filter?(vlan id 0-31 go to Q0,32-63->Q1....?) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-26 15:30 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-04-26 2:19 how to set vlan filter for intel 82599 zhou rui 2011-04-26 2:57 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 3:39 ` zhou rui 2011-04-26 3:51 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 4:39 ` zhou rui 2011-04-26 13:31 ` Ben Hutchings 2011-04-26 15:22 ` Alexander Duyck 2011-04-26 15:30 ` zhou rui
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).