From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:50:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1303829449.20212.285.camel@twins> References: <1303803414-5937-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1303827785.20212.266.camel@twins> <20110426144635.GK4658@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Neil Brown To: Mel Gorman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110426144635.GK4658@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:46 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: >=20 > I did find that only a few route-cache entries should be required. In > the original patches I worked with, there was a reservation for the > maximum possible number of route-cache entries. I thought this was > overkill and instead reserved 1-per-active-swapfile-backed-by-NFS. Right, so the thing I was worried about was a route-cache poison attack where someone would spam the machine such that it would create a lot of route cache entries and might flush the one we needed just as we needed it. Pinning the one entry we need would solve that (if possible). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org