From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: dont hold rtnl mutex during netlink dump callbacks
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:53:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304006030.3360.70.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110428084337.6b54603e@nehalam>
Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 08:43 -0700, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:56:07 +0200
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Four years ago, Patrick made a change to hold rtnl mutex during netlink
> > dump callbacks.
> >
> > I believe it was a wrong move. This slows down concurrent dumps, making
> > good old /proc/net/ files faster than rtnetlink in some situations.
> >
> > This occurred to me because one "ip link show dev ..." was _very_ slow
> > on a workload adding/removing network devices in background.
> >
> > All dump callbacks are able to use RCU locking now, so this patch does
> > roughly a revert of commits :
> >
> > 1c2d670f366 : [RTNETLINK]: Hold rtnl_mutex during netlink dump callbacks
> > 6313c1e0992 : [RTNETLINK]: Remove unnecessary locking in dump callbacks
> >
> > This let writers fight for rtnl mutex and readers going full speed.
> >
> > It also takes care of phonet : phonet_route_get() is now called from rcu
> > read section. I renamed it to phonet_route_get_rcu()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> > Cc: Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
Thanks for reviewing Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 8:56 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: dont hold rtnl mutex during netlink dump callbacks Eric Dumazet
2011-04-28 15:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-28 15:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-04-28 15:53 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-05-02 22:27 ` David Miller
2011-05-17 22:18 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: add rcu protection to netdev->ifalias Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 22:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-17 22:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-18 4:35 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304006030.3360.70.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox